The Appeal to consequences reference article from the English Wikipedia on 24-Jul-2004 (provided by Fixed Reference: snapshots of Wikipedia from wikipedia.org)

Appeal to consequences

Appeal to consequences, also known as argumentum ad consequentiam (Latin: argument to the consequences), seen by some to be a logical fallacy, consists of deducing the falsity of a conclusion (specifically a belief) from the negative or positive consequences that would follow belief.

Some examples:

• "You cannot believe that water companies should belong to the public. Think of all the utility shares our family owns!".
• "God must exist: so many people find happiness in religion."

In a sense, this fallacy is like confusing the consequences of a conclusion with evidence for the truth of that conclusion.

The argumentum ad baculum is a special case of appeal to consequences.

Compare to:

• wishful thinking
• appeal to fear
• argumentum ad hominem circumstantial form

This is the "Appeal to consequences" reference article from the English Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. See also our Disclaimer.