Formal thought disorder
In psychiatry, thought disorder or formal thought disorder is a term used to describe a symptom of psychotic mental illness.It describes a persistent underlying disturbance to conscious thought and is classified largely by its effects on speech and writing. Affected persons may show pressure of speech (speaking incessantly and quickly), derailment or flight of ideas (switching topic mid-sentence or inappropriately), thought blocking, rhyming or punning or 'word salad' when individual words may be intact but speech is incoherent.
| Table of contents |
|
2 Diagnostic issues 3 See also 4 Further Reading 5 References |
Pressure of speech
Distractible speech
Tangentiality
Derailment
Incoherence (word salad)
Illogicality
Clanging
Neologisms
Word approximations
Circumstantiality
Loss of goal
Perseveraton
Echolalia
Blocking
Stilted speech
Self-reference
Phonemic paraphasia
Semantic paraphasia
Subtypes in detail
Nancy Andreasen1 has given the following definitions.
An increase in the amount of spontaneous speech compared to what is considered customary.
During mid speech, the subject is changed in response to a stimulus. e.g. "Then I left San Francisco and moved to... where did you get that tie ?"
Replying to questions in an oblique, tangential or irrelevant manner. e.g. "What city are you from ?", "Well, that's a hard question. I'm from Iowa. I really don't know where my relatives came from, so I don't know if I'm Irish or French".
Ideas slip off the track on to another which is obliquely related or unrelated. e.g. "The next day when I'd be going out you know, I took control, like uh, I put bleach on my hair in California".
Speech that is unintelligible due to the fact that, though the individual words are real words, the manner in which they are strung together results in incoherent gibberish, e.g. the question "Why do people believe in God?" elicits a response like "Because make a twirl in life, my box is broken help me blue elephant. Isn't lettuce brave? I like electrons, hello."
Conclusions are reached that do not follow logically (non sequiturs or faulty inductive inferences).
Sounds rather than meaningful relationships appear to govern words. e.g. "I'm not trying to make noise. I'm trying to make sense. If you can't make sense out of nonsense, well, have fun".
New word formations. e.g. "I got so angry I picked up a dish and threw it at the geshinker".
Old words used in a new and unconventional way. e.g. "His boss was a seeover".
Speech that is very delayed at reaching its goal. Excessive long windedness.
Failure to show a chain of thought to a natural conclusion.
Persistent repetition of words or ideas. e.g. "I'll think I'll put on my hat, my hat, my hat, my hat, my hat, my hat, my hat, my hat..."
Echoing of other people's speech e.g. "Can we talk for a few minutes ?", "Talk for a few minutes".
Interruption of train of speech before completed.
Speech excessively stilted and formal. e.g. "The attourney comported himself indecorously".
Patient repeatedly and inappropriately refers back to self. e.g. "What's the time?", "It's 7 o'clock. That's my problem".
Mispronounciation; syllables out of sequence. e.g. "I slipped on the lice broke my arm".
Substitution of inappropriate word. e.g. "I slipped on the coat, on the ice I mean, and broke my book".Diagnostic issues
The concept of thought disorder has been criticised as being based on circular or incoherent definitions2. For example, thought disorder is inferred from disordered speech, however it is assumed that disordered speech arises because of disordered thought. Similarly the definition of 'Incoherence' (word salad) is that speech is incoherent. See also
Further Reading
References
1Andreasen NC. (1979) Thought, language, and communication disorders. I. Clinical assessment, definition of terms, and evaluation of their reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36(12), 1315-21.
2Bentall, R (2003) Madness explained: Psychosis and Human Nature. London: Penguin Books Ltd. ISBN 0713992492