Top-level domainInternet domain names consist of parts separated by periods; the last part is the top-level domain or TLD. For example, in the domain name wikipedia.org the top-level domain is org (or ORG, as domain names are not case-sensitive).
Two kinds of top-level domains exist. A country code top-level domain (ccTLD) is used by a country or a dependent territory and is two letters long, for example jp for Japan). A generic top-level domain (gTLD) is three or more letters long and is used (at least in theory) by a particular class of organizations (for example, com for commercial organizations). Most gTLDs are available for use worldwide, but for historical reasons gov and mil are restricted to the government and military of the USA respectively.
See also: List of Internet TLDs.
|Table of contents|
2 Generic top-level domains
3 Historical TLDs
4 Reserved TLDs
5 TLDs in alternate roots
6 See also
Country code top-level domains
There are over 240 ccTLDs: see List of Internet TLDs and . Most ccTLDs correspond to the two-letter ISO 3166-1 country codes, but there are several differences, explained below.
Each country appoints managers for its ccTLD and sets the rules for allocating domains. Some countries allow anyone in the world to acquire a domain in their ccTLD, for example Armenia (am), Austria (at) Cocos Islands (cc), Germany (de), Niue (nu), Samoa (ws), Tonga (to), Turkmenistan (tm) and Tuvalu (tv). This has resulted in the domain names I.am, start.at and go.to.
ISO 3166-1 codes not used as ccTLDs
The codes eh and kp, although theoretically available as ccTLDs for Western Sahara and North Korea, have never been assigned and do not exist in DNS.
ccTLDs not in ISO 3166-1
Eight ccTLDs currently remain in use despite not being ISO 3166-1 two-letter codes:
On September 25, 2000, ICANN decided to allow the use of any two-letter code in the ISO 3166-1 reserve list that is reserved for all purposes.
Only eu (for the European Union) currently meets this criterion.
Following a decision by the EU's Council of Telecommunications Ministers in March 2002, progress has been slow, but a registry (named EURid) has been appointed, and criteria for allocation set: the current estimate is that the eu ccTLD will be open for registrations in late 2004/early 2005.
- arpa — (see below)
- com — commercial
- edu — educational establishments (primarily US)
- gov — US government
- net — network infrastructure
- org — other organizations not clearly falling within the other gTLDs
- mil — US military
The arpa TLD was intended to be a temporary measure to facilitate the transition to the Domain Name System. However, removing it completely proved to be impractical, because in-addr.arpa is used for reverse DNS lookup for IPv4 addresses, so it has been retained for Internet-infrastructure purposes. The arpa TLD no longer has any connection with the ARPANET, and now officially stands for "Address and Routing Parameter Area".
Originally, it was intended that new infrastructure databases be created in int (see below), with a view to eventually deleting arpa. However, in May 2000 that policy was reversed, and it was decided that arpa should be retained for this purpose, and int should be retained solely for the use of international organizations. IANA considers arpa to be an infrastructure domain rather than a generic domain.
In November 1988, another gTLD was introduced:
- int — international organizations established by treaty (although it is also used for some Internet infrastructure databases, such as ip6.int, the IPv6 equivalent of in-addr.arpa).
By the mid-1990s there was pressure for more gTLDs to be introduced. Jon Postel, as head of IANA, invited applications from interested parties . In early 1995, Postel created "Draft Postel", an Internet draft containing the procedures to create new domain name registries and new TLDs. Draft Postel created a number of small committees to approve the new TLDs. Because of the increasing interest, an number of large organizations took over the process under the Internet Society's umbrella. This second attempt involved the setting up of a temporary organization called the International Ad Hoc Committee (IAHC). On 4 February 1997, the IAHC issued a report ignoring the Draft Postel recommendations and instead recommended the introduction of seven new gTLDs (arts, firm, info, nom, rec, store and web). However, progress on this stalled after the US Government intervened and nothing ever came of it.
In October 1998, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) formed to take over the task of managing domain names. After a call for proposals (August 15, 2000) and a brief period of public consultation, ICANN announced on November 16, 2000 its selection of the following seven new gTLDs:
- aero — air transport industry
- biz — businesses
- coop — cooperatives
- info — information (unrestricted use)
- museum — museums
- name — individuals
- pro — professionals
ICANN now intends to add further gTLDs, starting with a set of sponsored top-level domains (like the current aero, coop and museum). The application period for these lasted from 15 December 2003 until 16 March 2004, and resulted in ten applications. The most high-profile of these applications came from a consortium of companies including Microsoft, Vodafone, Samsung, Sun Microsystems and Nokia. It aims to develop a gTLD for mobile devices, potentially offering stripped-down versions of existing sites. The full list of proposed new TLDs consists of: asia, cat (or ctl or catala), jobs, mail (or tmail or mta), mobi (or mbl), post, tel, travel and xxx. Two separate, unrelated entities applied for tel.
The ARPANET was a predecessor to the Internet established by the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). When the Domain Name System was introduced, ARPANET host names were initially converted to domain names by adding .arpa to the end. Domain names of this form were rapidly phased out by replacing them with domain names using the other, more informative, TLDs. However, as has been explained above, the arpa TLD remains in use for other purposes including reverse DNS lookup where for example the IP address 126.96.36.199 is mapped to a host name by issuing a DNS query for the PTR record for the special host name 188.8.131.52.in-addr.arpa.
There are a few ccTLDs which have been deleted after the corresponding 2-letter code was withdrawn from ISO_3166-1. Examples include cs (for Czechoslovakia) and zr (for Zaire). There is usually a significant delay between withdrawal from ISO 3166-1 and deletion from the DNS. For example, zr ceased to be an ISO 3166-1 code in 1997, but the zr ccTLD was not deleted until 2001, and the su (Soviet Union) ccTLD remains in use more than a decade after su was removed from ISO 3166-1.
A nato TLD was added in the late 1980s by the NIC for the use of NATO, who felt that none of the then existing TLDs adequately reflected their status as an international organization. Soon after this addition, however, the NIC created the int TLD for the use of international organizations, and convinced NATO to use nato.int instead. However, the nato TLD, although no longer used, was not deleted until July 1996.
In the past the Internet was just one of many wide area computer networks. Computers not connected to the Internet, but connected to another network such as Bitnet or UUCP could generally exchange e-mail with the Internet via e-mail gateways. When used on the Internet, addresses on these networks were often placed under pseudo-domains such as bitnet and uucp; however these pseudo-domains were not real top-level domains and did not exist in DNS.
Most of these networks have long since ceased to exist, and although UUCP still gets significant use in parts of the world where Internet infrastructure has not yet become well-established, it subsequently transitioned to using Internet domain names, so pseudo-domains now largely survive as historical relics.
- example — reserved for use in examples
- invalid — reserved for use in obviously invalid domain names
- localhost — reserved to avoid conflict with the traditional use of localhost
- test — reserved for use in tests
TLDs in alternate rootsAlternate DNS roots have their own sets of TLDs. See that article for details.